The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development on July 11 released a comprehensive draft of the model rules countries would adopt to implement Amount A of Pillar One, a new taxing right that would allow market jurisdictions to tax a portion of residual profits from some of the largest multinational enterprises.
The Progress Report on Amount A of Pillar One, which was attached as an annex to the OECD Secretary-General Tax Report to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors, is a consultation document that includes draft rules on most of the building blocks of Amount A; however, the report does not yet include the rules on the administration of the new taxing right, including the tax certainty-related provisions. The consultation period will be open until August 19, 2022.
OECD Secretary General Matthias Cormann also confirmed the adoption of a new, “more realistic” time frame for the completion of work on Amount A, which had originally been slated for 2023. Concluding that “better right than rushed,” Cormann said work on the multilateral convention (MLC) for the implementation of Amount A and its Explanatory Statement are expected to be completed in the first half of 2023, with the objective of enabling it to enter into force in 2024 once a critical mass of jurisdictions have ratified it. (For prior coverage, see BDO’s OECD Pillar One Tax Rules Pushed Back to 2024 as Technical Work Continues).
In the nine months since the OECD announced on October 8, 2021, that more than 135 members of the Inclusive Framework on BEPS had reached agreement on a two-pillar solution to address the tax challenges arising from the digitalisation of the economy, the OECD had been conducting rolling public consultations on some of the component parts, or building blocks, of the Amount A model rules, including nexus and revenue sourcing; tax base determinations, scope, extractives exclusion, regulated financial services exclusion and tax certainty. The progress report states that more than 250 stakeholders have provided input on the design of those building blocks.
The new draft includes updated guidance on the building blocks that had already been subject to public consultation, as well as guidance on the remaining building blocks for which no previous guidance had been released:
The OECD’s approach to administration is not included in the guidance released. A separate document, with sections on administration and tax certainty, will be released before the next Inclusive Framework meeting in October.
In calling for comments from stakeholders on the newly released guidance, the progress reports states that “the novelty of the concepts relating to this new taxing right and its integration within the existing international tax architecture merit further deliberation with respect to a few of the building blocks.”
The core elements of the model rules on Amount A, found in Section 2 of the progress report, were developed by the Task Force on the Digital Economy (TFDE), taking into account the stakeholder input received under various public consultations. These core elements include the following:
One of the OECD’s objectives in creating the new taxing right represented by Amount A was “to restore stability to the international tax framework and prevent further uncoordinated unilateral tax measures, as a multilaterally agreed solution will avoid the risk of retaliatory trade sanctions that could result from unilateral approaches such as digital services taxes.” To that end, the MLC will contain provisions requiring the withdrawal of all existing digital service taxes (DSTs) and similar measures with respect to all companies, and will include a definitive list of these existing measures.
While technical work on both Pillars One and Two of the OECD approach to the taxation of the digital economy continues, the project has run into some political hurdles. In his report, Cormann wrote “[A]ll G-7 countries, the European Union, a number of G-20 countries, and many others have already scheduled changes in their domestic legislation to introduce the model rules,” adding that “implementation of the global minimum corporate tax seems ineluctable.” However, the two-pillar plan has not yet been adopted in the EU, which originally planned to proceed to quick implementation but has not been able to get all member states on board, or in the U.S., where concerns that the new rules could have a negative economic effect has stymied the adoption process.
We have a range of insights analysing the changing landscape of the taxation of the digital economy and have submitted comments to the OECD on Pillars One and Two. View our insights within our Taxation of the Digital Economy hub.
Mark Schuette
mschuette@bdo.com
Monika Loving
mloving@bdo.com
Ross Robertson
ross.robertson@bdo.co.uk